-
Archives
- July 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
-
Meta
Photos » dad » Dr Peter Loth Takes a Look
Taken on: 2007-04-20 09:59:33
Tags: aidan james love, aidan love, aidan, james, love, circumcision, circumcised, circumcise, doctor peter loth, peter loth, doctor loth, penis, mum, dad, robert love, amanda love, queensland
Dr Loth began by explaining and demonstrating how he would perform Aidan's circumcision. He then examined Aidan.
Comments:
latinemogirl46
wow...
emmer84
you should make these photos private to avoid harrassing comments ad perves. It's up to you to circumsise him don't listen to others.
drealgrin
actually it's not up to them. it's not their body. but whatever.
rob1796
it's a good decision; clean, no infection problems... His future girlfriend will also like...
My little brother had that done too.
LittleBeePhotography
So God didn't make your son perfect eh? I'm sorry he didn't live up to your expectations?
@rob "it's a good decision; clean, no infection problems" - that's what Indonesian parents say when they hold a little girls leg's apart and cut off her foreskin (hood). And that's why Australia is struggling to persuade immigrant communities to stop doing this...because of the white hypocrisy. A girl is 10 times more likely to get smegma and 2-3 times more likely to get cancer of her genitals. One in four or so women get regular attacks of thrush. So if this family have a girl next should they be allowed to excise her flaps and folds Rob? a horrifying though isn't it - because it's vital nerve rich tissue which protects whats beneath and contributes extra joy in sex JUST AS IT DOES FOR A MAN! And here's another reason your point is nonsense - a recent recent Australian study showed cut males have double the risk of urethritis - a common issue seen in STD clinics. This is because the ulceration and scarring which results from an infant circumcision damages his urinary opening, narrowing it (drastically in some cases) The point about this is that like psychological harm and skin bridges (where the foreskin remnant reattaches itself permanently) this is a complication specific to early childhood circ. Had this family let baby grow up and choose even if he chose a circumcision it would have much much lower risks. It shows how horrible infant circ is - it's not only unethical to take away his most sensitive bit of skin, it's less safe to do it when he's a child...
malpaschick
A very sensible decision ,getting him done at birth will avoid any future problems,No chance of Phomosis or Balanitis Etc.Far healthier fio any female partners he will have when an aduklt.My son was done at Five days old,He is nearly Eighteen now,Lovw,Suzanne.